Karti P Chidambaram

self, Karti P Chidambaram, age 52

Business

spouse, Srinidhi Karti Chidambaram

Doctor

Sources of income

• Business Self-salary, Rental, Capital Gain, Deposit Interest, and Agricultural self
• Doctor Salary, Rental, Deposit Interest and Agricultural spouse

Social media handles

• X (Twitter) given
• Facebook given
• Instagram given

Additional disclosures

• Income Tax Dept. a) Black Money Act, Penalty AY 2016-17 Rs.20,28,526/- Appeal Pending with Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, Chennai - 18.
• Income Tax Dept. b) Black Money Act, Penalty AY 2017-18 Rs.10,00,000/- after passing Nil assessment order. Appeal Pending with Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal, Chennai - 18.
• Income Tax Dept. a) The demand raised by the assessing officer for AY 2009-10 Rs.2,88,456/- was quashed by Single Judge of the Madras High Court. However, the Income Tax Department has filed a writ appeal before the Madras High Court and the same is pending.
• Income Tax Dept. b) The assessing officer raised the tax demand U/S. 153(C) and 143(3) of Income Tax Act 1961 for the following years: AY 2014-15 - Rs.3,86,60,072/-, AY 2015-16 - Rs.1,23,60,589/-, AY 2017-18 - Rs.42,25,540/-, AY 2018-19 - Rs.73,42,851/-, and Sec. 143(3) AY 2019-20 - Rs.20,79,710/- The Hon'ble Madras High Court has quashed and set aside the tax demand for the above periods and directed the Assessing Officer to make a reassessment. However, the department filed an appeal and the same is pending.
• Income Tax Dept. c) The Tax demand raised under Section 143(1)(a) AY 2021-22 Rs.7,740/- for TDS mismatch, I filed my disagreement with the demand with the Income Tax Department.

Totals printed in the affidavit

• Gross Total value self assets ₹3.03 Cr Not yet verified The totals printed in the affidavit do not add up.
• Gross Total value spouse assets ₹1.23 Cr Not yet verified The totals printed in the affidavit do not add up.
• Total of current market value of (i) to (v) above self assets ₹2.47 Cr Not yet verified The totals printed in the affidavit do not add up.
• Total of current market value of (i) to (v) above spouse assets ₹2.90 Cr Not yet verified The totals printed in the affidavit do not add up.
• Grand total of liabilities self liabilities ₹1.23 Cr Not yet verified The totals printed in the affidavit do not add up.
• Grand total of liabilities spouse liabilities ₹11.16 Cr Not yet verified The totals printed in the affidavit do not add up.

PAN: given

Contact details: given

Criminal cases (11)

• pending, It is falsely alleged that I (through firms directly or indirectly controlled by me) allegedly have received quid pro quo for grant of FIPB approval for GCSHL Mauritius.
  120-B of IPC, Sections 7, 12 and Section 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
  Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-09 (MPs/MLAs Cases), RADC
  charges not framed
• pending, It is falsely alleged that I used my influence to scuttle a probe in relation to the grant of FIPB approval to INX Media /News for alleged illegal gratification.
  120-B of IPC, r/w Setion.420, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 9 & 13 (2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 & substantive offences thereof.
  Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-09 (MPs/MLAs Cases), RADC
  charges not framed
• pending, Based on the FIR registered by CBI in FIR No RC-DAI-2011-A-0022, it is falsely alleged that I engaged in money laundering of the proceeds of crime alleged by the CBI in its investigation.
  Section 3 read with section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
  Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-09 (MPs/MLAs Cases), RADC
  charges not framed
• pending, Based on the FIR registered by CBI in FIR No RC-220-2017-E-0011, it is falsely alleged that I engaged in money laundering of the proceeds of crime alleged by the CBI in its investigation.
  Section 3 read with section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
  Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-09 (MPs/MLAs Cases), RADC
  charges not framed
• pending, It is falsely alleged that I used my influence to secure permission for project visas to M/s Talwandi Sabo Power Ltd. in exchange for illegal gratification.
  Section 120-B read with Section 477-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Sections 8 and 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
  Not Applicable
  charges not framed
• pending, Based on the FIR registered by CBI in FIR No RC 220 2022 E0006, it is falsely alleged that I engaged in money laundering of the proceeds of the crime. It is pertinent to point out that though it has come to my knowledge from information in the public domain that a prosecution complaint (charge sheet) has been filed by ED and the Special Court has taken cognizance and issued summons. However, as on date, I have not received any summons.
  Section 3 read with section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
  Special Judge (PC Act)(CBI)-09 (MPs/MLAs Cases), RADC
  charges not framed
• pending, It is falsely alleged that during my election campaign in 2014, a few vehicles accompanying my convoy did not have the required permission.
  Section 143 and 188 of IPC.
  Judicial Magistrate Court, Tiruppattur.
  charges not framed
• pending, It is falsely alleged that irregularities were committed during the execution of 108 ambulance services in Rajasthan
  Sections 120-B, 420,467,468 & 471 of IPC.
  Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, CBI cases, Jaipur.
  charges not framed
• pending, Based on the FIR No.2172015A0111 registered by CBI, it is falsely alleged that I engaged in Money Laundering of the proceeds of the crime.
  Section 3 read with section 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
  Not applicable
  charges not framed
• pending, It was falsely alleged that I did not declare the foreign asset details in Schedule FA in my Income Tax Returns.
  Section 50 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act of 2015.
  Before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Egmore, Chennai
  charges not framed
• pending, It is falsely alleged that a part of the sale consideration on the sale of lands was received in cash and hence it was alleged that I did not disclose the alleged sale consideration in my Income Tax Return and that my ITR is allegedly false.
  Sections 276 C (1), 277 and 278 of the Income Tax Act 1961.
  Not Applicable
  charges not framed